Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > shel0407 > My Blog |
|
why is likesmatures always so clueless and uninformed has anyone else noticed that likesmatures blogs are pathetic and uninformed diatribes? can we hope he researches and informs himself before he blogs? |
|||
|
Don't hold your breath on that one. Welcome to the blogs anyway. Best to you. "One Big Sky Covers Us All Equally"
| ||
|
Unfortunately, it's a common habit of a sizable demographic of what is currently under show within the American population. Don't worry, it's just as bad everywhere else, just 4 years under Trumpery, the election debacle, and covid, have highlighted it in your country. Hopefully those with half a brain will realise how widespread it is. We all stand with you in this time of pain.
| ||
|
It doesn't matter what a person posts, if you haven't learned to not read what you don't like by now, it might be too late.
| ||
|
there's no requirement to read his stuff
| ||
1/2/2021 9:09 pm |
It doesn't matter what a person posts, if you haven't learned to not read what you don't like by now, it might be too late. Into the woods I go, to lose my mind and find my soul.
| ||
|
As society morphs to more and more individuals, losing their individuality, while maintaining that each is more entitled than anyone else, we can only rest assured in the fact that the only thing we are entitled to is our own opinion. You might feel that likesmatures is clueless and misinformed, but I am sure that you must agree to the fact that likes matures, always owns that opinion and I am also sure that you would be the last person on earth to deny that entitlement.
| ||
|
Leo represents a certain demographic. He develops many of his posts while drinking vodka, which probably accounts for their quality. He's harmless and his blogs provide some insight into what Joe sixpack is thinking; otherwise they're useless.  He was sympathetic to Biden before Biden became a viable candidate but I think he gets more mileage out of being anti-Biden now. He just wants attention. It's a common fault among bloggers. I stopped commenting on his blog a long time ago. It just encourages him. 
| ||
|
the problem i have with leo, other than his incessant and redundant references to government cheese, is that he's a hypocrite of the highest order. he says he's "honestly" looking for dissenting opinions, and he's encouraged people to post, but he fails to mention that he's blocked many respectful posters who disagree with him from posting on his blog. so his blog is an echo chamber and reminds me of a trump white house press conference... alternative facts with very little actual truth. it's a cavalcade of conspiracy theories taken directly from newsmax, the drudge report and OANN. leo also has a "tell" that's rather obvious... whenever he says "i'm not a racist," or "i'm not a trump supporter," or i'm not this or that... you can bet your bottom dollar that he is decidedly this and *especially* that.
| ||
|
My problem with the blog post is that who comes here to discuss that? My advice to whoever that guy is... if you want a discussion, you find it but give the rest of us a break. Just a thought from one who sees those posts... shakes his head... and ignores.
| ||
|
He does bring a certain perspective to light. He may also be more honest than a lot of others on here or else where . I would rather deal with someone who may be totally opposite in thinking than me, but honest than getting the surprised knife in the back.
| ||
|
leo says in his most recent blog post, complaining about this blog post: "...i have no problem with someone holding a different opinion. we can agree to disagree and be civil adults on here..we can have an open discussion. i welcome various views and opinions on my blog." but many respectful posters are prohibited from commenting on his blog. still others are prohibited (by leo) from even reading his blog! so how are they supposed to have a dialog with the self proclaimed honey badger? this is the fundamental falsehood that overrides any claim leo makes for an open door policy. when he says all are welcome to disagree with him, he's being disingenuous at best. he may bring a certain perspective to light, but he is inherently dishonest and highly repetitive. he repeats blog posts from one day to the next, seemingly having forgotten that he had already posted the very same thing. he almost always presents only one side of the story (mitch mcconnell had the front door of his home defaced, but leo doesn't mention that nancy pelosi did, too... which debunks the BS hypotheses that he espouses). his recent rant on the BBC was incredibly misguided. and his relentless frustration at not being compensated (!) by alt for his rambling and incoherent posts is as nonsensical as it is humorous. especially when he refers to his posts as "intellectual property."
| ||
|
What I find interesting is that a person would continuously read a blog that is constantly "pathetic and uninformed" and then take the time out of their day to post about it in their own blog. I call BS on the people complaining about his blog. Anyone who wasn't interested in it would ignore it and go about their lives. it is very easy to not read a blog on this site. It takes more work to read someone else's blog than to ignore it. What does that say?
| ||
1/3/2021 3:08 pm |
Which begs the question. Why are you commenting on this post? And can we really take anyone seriously if they are too wet to say bullshit when they mean it.
| ||
|
>>it is very easy to not read a blog on this site. it takes more work to read someone else's blog than to ignore it. what does that say?<< it's not the reading of the blog that is the issue... it's the ability to comment on it if one chooses to read it. by not allowing respectful dissenting discourse, the honey badger creates an echo chamber in which his voice rings true... many reading his blog read the chorus of approvals and say, " well, i guess there must be something there, that leo must be one helluva smart guy since so many people agree with him." that's innocent enough when he's droning on about the psychology of his domme / sub relationships or the merits of his small penis... it's something altogether different when he pontificates on political matters, which he completely misrepresents... time after time. and even that would be OK, except for that one little pesky detail... he repeatedly claims he welcomes all... he repeatedly asks for opposing viewpoints... yet his blog excludes many of the most outspoken (yet respectful) posters. and the assumption to the casual reader is that if the people who don't agree with him don't post, well, they must agree with him. and many do not. it's just that they have been banned from reading and/or posting as some sort of power play to boost the self proclaimed honey badger's ego. note: apparently, my autocorrect keeps wanting to make "honey badger" into "hiney badger." in a way, that's far more fitting.
| ||
|
Which begs the question. Why are you commenting on this post? And can we really take anyone seriously if they are too wet to say bullshit when they mean it.
| ||
1/29/2021 9:46 pm |
At least I haven't seen Vlad around recently, but there's always some doofus willing to step in and fill the idiot breach.
|
 |
 |
 |
| Become a member to comment on this blog | ||
 |
×
×