Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
Blogs > newAndCurious888 > My Blog |
Trump VP: The insurance policy for 2024 Victory I think there are a lot of traps for a Trump VP pick. Trump needs to just remember that a VP pick is not about who you like personally, but the VP pick is about electoral votes. I love the electoral college. Clinton and Gore do too. With that said, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin are the states in play. They decide the election in 2024. Everyone else will just offset each other. Therefore, keep the VP pick as close to the midwest as possible. Tim Scott, Nikki Haley, and everyone else in the field is just too far away from the midwest. They will not relate to Wisconsin and Michigan at all. I do not love any picks right now, but Kristi Noem is the price is right pick for now. She is the closest without going over. Plus, the added bonus is that the left wing backlash from California and New York would be enormous. Why not have a little fun while you are winning too. |
|||
10/15/2023 2:33 pm |
Trump 47. Trump/Noem 47 ???
| ||
|
Trump 47. Trump/Noem 47 ??? So, you are just on the wrong side. You support racism and hate the poor, well, except for the white poor as poll taxes were relaxed for them cause they were white.
| ||
|
"So, you are just on the wrong side. You support racism and hate the poor, well, except for the white poor as poll taxes were relaxed for them cause they were white". You can always tell a racist......its the first thing out of their mouth.....just chalk him up as one of those "willfully ignorant" ones......to coin some dumb asses words.....aka mr know not all........
| ||
|
"So, you are just on the wrong side. You support racism and hate the poor, well, except for the white poor as poll taxes were relaxed for them cause they were white". You can always tell a racist......its the first thing out of their mouth.....just chalk him up as one of those "willfully ignorant" ones......to coin some dumb asses words.....aka mr know not all........
| ||
|
When did Alt become a political site?
| ||
|
When did Alt become a political site?
| ||
|
trump is disqualified from holding public office under the 14th amendment.
| ||
|
trump is disqualified from holding public office under the 14th amendment.
| ||
|
the 14th doesn't include the POTUS and VPOTUS offices. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment essentially disqualifies from office anyone who engaged in "insurrection or rebellion" against the U.S. SCOTUS ruled against trump in every election case that was put before them. Section 3 is most significant because it does not require that the person be convicted of "insurrection" only that they engaged in the attempt. There were approx. 600 insurrectionists convicted by DOJ and most are set to testify that they believed trump directed them to storm the capitol and to hang the vice president.
| ||
|
Noem would have been a great pick until a few weeks ago when it came out that she was having an affair. A long standing one at that. Trump may be able to get away with that but not noem. She can deny it all she wants but the damage will run all the way through the election. Do as i say not as i do may have worked well in the past but it is quickly becoming tiresome. In good times people can overlook this but not when everything is in the crapper for most. noem, MTG and boebert are like the rest of the establishment. That does not bode well to the base. Hope
| ||
|
the 14th doesn't include the POTUS and VPOTUS offices. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment essentially disqualifies from office anyone who engaged in "insurrection or rebellion" against the U.S. SCOTUS ruled against trump in every election case that was put before them. Section 3 is most significant because it does not require that the person be convicted of "insurrection" only that they engaged in the attempt. There were approx. 600 insurrectionists convicted by DOJ and most are set to testify that they believed trump directed them to storm the capitol and to hang the vice president. Nobody has been convicted of insurrection - yet. Just seditious conspiracy. SCOTUS will side on trumps side. Yes, SCOTUS voted against Trump for election cases, but those are not constitutional cases. For this case, if there is a loophole, and there is, SCOTUS will take it. Sad, but I think this is how it will go down......
|
Become a member to comment on this blog | ||
×
×