Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service

rondiri 65M
7305 posts
2/4/2024 10:50 am

Last Read:
2/5/2024 8:38 am

Noncompliance


article in comments

rondiri 65M
11182 posts
2/4/2024 10:51 am

For a submissive, there are a few reasons for noncompliance with a Dominant’s directions.
First and foremost, is that the direction is in conflict with the consented to agreements made before consent was given by the submissive.
It is the Dominant’s responsibility to stay within the agreed upon dynamic. Yes, the Dominant can push the limits of a submissive in an attempt to grow the dynamic and the submissive. But the submissive is under no obligation to do anything outside what was agreed to and consented to.
A second reason is if the direction is outside the submissive’s physical, emotional or intellectual capabilities. Again, the Dominant can try to push these limits of the submissive, but if the submissive cannot follow the direction because it is beyond their capabilities, they cannot be held responsible for failure. The submissive may try in an attempt to please the Dominant, or they may realize the effort would be futile. But either way, agreed upon consent should be adhered to.
A third reason, one not all agree about, is the submissive being noncompliant because they wish to get a desired result from the Dominant. IE: being a brat. Or the more traditional form, a SAM. (Smart Ass Masochist) It is important to note, that being a brat or SAM, should have its limits of noncompliance. Otherwise the submissive just tends to be a disobedient submissive that just wants to get their own desired results with no regard to the dynamic or the Dominant.
The difference between the first two example and the third, is that the first two deserve no punishment or discipline. The noncompliance was by right and fair. Being a brat or a SAM is actually looking for discipline or punishment and the Dominant has a choice. Give the brat/SAM what they want and make the m happy or give them something they DON’T want and actually discipline/punish them to thwart their attempt at being a brat/SAM.
© 2/4/24 Ronald Dirienzo


brandygirasol 55T
9435 posts
2/4/2024 11:04 am

AGREED😎


rondiri replies on 2/5/2024 8:38 am:

manni_pr 52T
2609 posts
2/4/2024 11:08 am

Sounds reasonable. Dealing with brats it's very tricky, though. Not every Dom will have the tolerance or interest inputting up with such, although some others will love the challenge. Thanks Ron


rondiri replies on 2/5/2024 8:38 am:

Artschoolgrad 47M
8737 posts
2/4/2024 12:02 pm

yes!


rondiri replies on 2/5/2024 8:38 am:


Become a member to comment on this blog