Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
Blogs > TheGentleD0M > «« The Sway of Aphrodite »» |
21st Century Girl This post is only viewable by Local Fetish Fans members. Join Local Fetish Fans now! |
||||
|
. Propose The Reason For The Title
| |||
|
| |||
|
OMG ! Is she not real ? Just a graphic generated either through photoshopping together bits of other pics or an automated artists impression of a human ? I hadn't thought of it until mokyloks comments about skin tone. And just in case I'm right - a very happy holiday season to the robot overlords. 😀
| |||
|
Could it be that she is less than 20 years old?
| |||
|
Most likely the idea was that she would be less than 20. Maybe she was when those pics were taken. But that would have been 12 years ago then.
| |||
|
Don't tell me she's a replicant - (psst, when can I book her?). No ring on her finger, but she's a young women. In any decade that doesn't mean much. In any case posing for a photo like that she may prefere to remove a ring. Skin tones to me could be just down to position of lighting. Hairless kitty, Although much more popular to day, but women have been doing that since at least the seventies, & probably much, much longer. Can't see a birth date tattoo, or any sign of a smartphone in the shot. The make up appears to me to be in the modern style, which can sometimes seem false/overdone. The more I look at the face now you got me questioning if it's real. I do hope you are not going to tell us she is computer generated! having said that I do hope you are going to tell us the answer.
| |||
|
| |||
|
OMG ! Is she not real ? Just a graphic generated either through photoshopping together bits of other pics or an automated artists impression of a human ? I hadn't thought of it until mokyloks comments about skin tone. And just in case I'm right - a very happy holiday season to the robot overlords. 😀
| |||
|
Could it be that she is less than 20 years old?
| |||
|
Most likely the idea was that she would be less than 20. Maybe she was when those pics were taken. But that would have been 12 years ago then.
| |||
|
Don't tell me she's a replicant - (psst, when can I book her?). No ring on her finger, but she's a young women. In any decade that doesn't mean much. In any case posing for a photo like that she may prefere to remove a ring. Skin tones to me could be just down to position of lighting. Hairless kitty, Although much more popular to day, but women have been doing that since at least the seventies, & probably much, much longer. Can't see a birth date tattoo, or any sign of a smartphone in the shot. The make up appears to me to be in the modern style, which can sometimes seem false/overdone. The more I look at the face now you got me questioning if it's real. I do hope you are not going to tell us she is computer generated! having said that I do hope you are going to tell us the answer.
| |||
|
| |||
|
tgd
| |||
|
| |||
|
Just a little googling . And yes I came across her stage name too, which you mentioned in your answers.
| |||
|
| |||
|
When I first looked at the photo, before I read your question, I just thought, Wow, she's fantastic! The replicant comment was a joke of course, but with regard to computer generated. They can do such amazing things, like putting dead film stars in TV ads. Anyway I think the penny has droped. If I'm right, yeah she knows, & she doesn't care. Are you perhaps refering the fact you can see her anus in the photo? If you are suggesting, this is a 21st century thing. I would agree that it's become much more prevelant this century, but although more rare, shots showing the anus have been around for awhile. The first one I saw was in the 70's, but I believe a lot more of the models would have been reluctant to pose in that way last century. Please let me know if I'm right, or tell us what we've missed if it's something else.
| |||
|
When I first looked at the photo, before I read your question, I just thought, Wow, she's fantastic! The replicant comment was a joke of course, but with regard to computer generated. They can do such amazing things, like putting dead film stars in TV ads. Anyway I think the penny has droped. If I'm right, yeah she knows, & she doesn't care. Are you perhaps refering the fact you can see her anus in the photo? If you are suggesting, this is a 21st century thing. I would agree that it's become much more prevelant this century, but although more rare, shots showing the anus have been around for awhile. The first one I saw was in the 70's, but I believe a lot more of the models would have been reluctant to pose in that way last century. Please let me know if I'm right, or tell us what we've missed if it's something else.
| |||
|
| |||
12/1/2020 4:49 am |
Every man's dream.
| |||
|
Every man's dream.
| |||
|
|
Become a member to comment on this blog | ||
×
×